Option 1:
- a phase III trial (meaning that the medication is safe, and they are trying to determine its precise effectiveness.)
- It combines a RAF pathway inhibitor (Sorafenib) with chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel, developed in the 80's). The RAF pathway inhibitor ideally should prevent cancerous cells from multiplying.
- side-effects are typical of chemotherapy-- hair loss, nausea, etc., i.e., all that nastiness.
- It's not entirely clear what the response rates are for advanced melanoma.
From the Consent Form:
[Sorafenib] may slow the growth of your cancer by stopping cancer cells from multiplying and growth of vessels that support cancer cells. Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in combination with [sorafenib] may have additional effect on your cancer that has spread or cannot be treated with surgery.
Option 2:
- a phase I/II trial (meaning they don't know how safe this drug is. The trial is in part to determine the proper, safe, and effective dosage. It's also investigational-- meaning they don't know what kind of effects to expect. They've only tested it in a laboratory.)
- It involves an oral dosage of RAF265 (another cancer growth inhibitor) given over various periods of time.
- Side effects are generally unknown ("This is the first study of RAF265 in humans"). But at the same time, they can extrapolate probable and possible side effects. It is predicted to be moderate compared to option 1.
- From the consent form:
Labratory studies have shown that RAF265 slows or inhibits the growth of melanoma cells and melanoma tumors.
Dr. Atkins recommends the 2nd option for a couple of reasons. First, he thinks it has more potential to be effective. Second, if Aimee takes the first option, she can't take the second (this is the way a lot of clinical trials work-- once you've had some treatment, it precludes you from others.). But if she takes the second option, she still has the possibility of the first.
Both trials will take place here in Boston. We asked him whether there are other options in DC or Houston, and he said that Houston is doing the same thing, and DC is focusing on a treatment that Aimee is ineligible for (wrong blood type).
So-- after all that ... We're leaning towards the second option, mostly because Atkins thinks it's more promising and it won't cut off other possibilities.
6 comments:
Whichever you decide sounds good to me. I think its hilarious that Dr. Atkins is your doctor :)
It looks like #2 is the better way. It seems to keep the most options open to both of you. But only you know all the ins and outs of the situation. Pray and choose.
Cascades of prayers (and a box of citrus stuff) are being sent your way!
Love,
Chris and Bainard
Not that you need this ratification, but it seems very logical to go with 2. Thanks for keeping us so full of information, Will and Aimee. You have no idea how helpful this is as we continue to think about you both, you all, throughout the days and nights. Just all of our love coming your way.
Hilary and Kevin
God be with you both as you make this difficult decision - I don't even like choosing what to have for dinner :)
In all seriousness, our prayers continue as you forge ahead!
Love,
Katy & Fam
Hi Will and Aim,
I'm resorting to more international means of communication: greetings from Rome!
Praying for you guys. All so difficult.
Hugs to all.
Love always,
Nee
Hi guys! As always, lots of prayers and love!
Post a Comment